![]() ![]() ![]() Compatible future generations of CPUs will be added as they become available. New Windows 11 devices must use modern device drivers which have passed the Windows Hardware Compatibility Program for Windows 11 or the latest available modern device drivers based on Declarative, Componentized, Hardware Support Apps (DCH) design principles. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.OEMs may use the following CPUs for new Windows 11 devices. Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) ![]() Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3147Ħth Generation Intel® Core™ i3 ProcessorsĭDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s.Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2258 vs 1844 x264 Pass 2 es una variante más lenta de la compresión de vídeo x264 que produce un archivo de salida con una tasa de bits variable, lo que se traduce en una mejor calidad, ya que la tasa de bits más alta se utiliza cuando es más necesaria.Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1259 vs 659.Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3147.Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2258 vs 1844.Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1259 vs 659.Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.873 vs 0.711.Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.222 vs 0.115.2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 35.603 vs 14.641.Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1290 vs 975.On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. Around 77% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 561 vs 317 We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.1 GHz Intel Pentium N4200 with 4-cores against the 2.2 GHz Core i3 8130U with 2-cores.Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2622 vs 2128.Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1344 vs 853.4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB.Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-6100U Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Core i3-6100UĬomparative analysis of Intel Pentium N4200 and Intel Core i3-6100U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality.īenchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).ĬompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)ĬompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |